Democrats FASCIST proclamations that produced an Assassin

 

 

 

j 

Hey, Fascist....CATCH!

Accumulation of all the LPCMI's #LPCMI who proclaimed Conservatives to BE FASCIST....should be the aim to understand just how actual hate speech can morph into action.. https://www.businessinsider.com/aoc-us-environment-fascism-jim-crow-era-voter-intimidation-2022-10

https://youtu.be/MDOsmC8yYMA?si=c8A7jlJEKyfTt8Uc 

 Mehdi Hasan Calls Conservatives Cheering Far Right Messages At CPAC 'Facism'

https://www.facebook.com/groups/407886918530422/ 

 Canadians. Please listen to this expert. He describes the fascist the ultra right like mini Trump Danielle Smith , PP, all of the IDU leaders, and Scott. posts/699708236014954/

https://time.com/6306945/donald-trump-democrats-fascists/  

Why Trump and His Supporters Keep Calling Democrats ‘Fascists’

 

While it's impossible to find *every* clip on this topic (as new content emerges constantly across platforms like YouTube, X, and news sites), I've searched X (formerly Twitter) and the web for relevant video clips where public figures, commentators, or media explicitly proclaim conservatives (or specific conservative figures/parties like Trump, MAGA, or the GOP) as fascists. These often appear in political debates, speeches, interviews, or social media shares. Below, I've curated notable examples from recent and historical contexts, focusing on direct proclamations. I've prioritized clips with high visibility or engagement, including embedded X videos and YouTube links.

### Notable Video Clips from X Posts
These are clips shared directly on X, often with video embeds or links, where users or quoted figures label conservatives as fascists:

- **Kamala Harris Calls Trump a Fascist (CNN Town Hall, October 2024)**: In this widely shared clip, Vice President Harris responds "Yes, I do" when asked if Trump is a fascist, citing his threats to democracy and authoritarian tendencies. Multiple X users reposted it in September 2025 contexts, blaming such rhetoric for political violence.  
  - Video link: [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wO0fglSeaYc) (Duration: ~1 min)  
  - Shared on X by @ArcherBM (September 12, 2025) with 0 likes, but part of broader threads.

- **Mehdi Hasan on Conservatives Cheering Far-Right Messages (MSNBC, August 2022)**: Journalist Mehdi Hasan calls out conservatives for applauding fascist-like rhetoric at events, stating, "I am going to continue to call it fascism." Resurfaced in 2025 discussions on X.  
  - Video link: [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDOsmC8yYMA) (Duration: ~2 min)  
  - Referenced in X semantic search results.

- **AOC Labels Conservatives as Fascists Inciting Violence (Congressional Speech, 2024-2025)**: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez calls conservatives "fascists" in floor speeches, accusing them of demonizing opponents and fueling violence. Shared in a September 12, 2025 X post.  
  - No direct embed, but discussed in context with images; related clip from C-SPAN: [C-SPAN Clip](https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4105599/user-clip-clip-iamerican-fascistsi) (Duration: ~30 sec).

- **Canadian Conservative Party Called "New-Fascist" (January 2024)**: A clip from a Canadian political discussion labels the Conservative Party of Canada as "the new-fascist party," tying it to MAGA-style rhetoric. Viewed 6K+ times on X.  
  - Embedded video on X by @Garnet_2203 (182 likes).  
  - Video link: Embedded on X (Duration: ~4 min).

- **Left-Wing Extremist Calls MAGA a "Fascist Regime" (TikTok Clip, March 2025)**: A viral TikTok shared on X shows a user urging Democrats to use the military against "MAGA fascists."  
  - Embedded video on X by @DerrickEvans4WV (215 likes).  
  - Video link: Embedded on X (Duration: ~1 min).

- **Jubilee Debate with Self-Proclaimed Fascist (July 2025)**: In a viral debate video, a participant admits, "Yeah, I am [a fascist]," amid applause from others, sparking backlash and shares calling it representative of conservative extremism.  
  - No direct X embed in results, but discussed in threads; full clip: [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2S-WJN3L5eo) (Duration: ~10 min, from Jubilee channel).

- **Joe Scarborough: "Trump is a Fascist" (MSNBC, January 2021)**: Morning Joe host directly calls Trump a fascist, resurfaced in 2025 X posts amid election rhetoric.  
  - Video link: [YouTube]

(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3W_U4ZqQH3Q) (Duration: ~5 min, from November 2023 context but original 2021).

- **The Good Liars on Trump Supporters Wanting Military Arrests (November 2024)**: Comedians highlight a Trump supporter saying he wants the military to arrest Washington officials, calling it fascist behavior despite denials. 11K+ likes on X.  
  - Embedded video on X by @TheGoodLiars.  
  - Video link: Embedded on X (Duration: ~45 sec).

### Additional Clips from Web Searches
These are prominent videos from news outlets and YouTube, often cited in articles or resurfaced in social media:

- **John Kelly on Trump's Fascist Traits (CNN Interview, October 2024)**: Trump's former chief of staff calls him a fascist who admires dictators and wants to be one. Part of broader discussions on fascism in US politics.  
  - Video link: [CNN Clip](https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2024/10/24/lead-john-kelly-trump-fascist.cnn) (Duration: ~2 min).

- **Biden Calls MAGA "Semi-Fascism" (September 2022)**: President Biden labels MAGA Republicans as exhibiting "semi-fascism" in a speech, resurfaced after Harris's comments. Includes a 2020 Trump clip calling Democrats fascists for contrast.  
  - Video link: [YouTube (Fox News Reaction)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Zs099E7g9c) (Duration: ~3 min).

- **Steve Bannon's Fascist-Style Salute at CPAC (February 2025)**:

 At the Conservative Political Action Conference, Bannon gives a salute critics called fascist, amid chants.  
  - Video link: 

[Guardian Video](

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2025/feb/21/steve-bannon-gives-fascist-style-salute-at-us-conservative-political-action-conference-video

) (Duration: ~30 sec).

- **Tucker Carlson Calls Media (Except Fox) Fascist (Fox News, November 2019)**: In a clip viewed widely, Carlson labels non-Fox media as fascist threats, ironic given later accusations against conservatives.  
  - Video link: [YouTube](

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kueydOmoydKHJKmj) (Duration: ~1.5 min, from C-SPAN/MMFA).

These examples span from 2019 to 2025, often tied to elections, violence, or debates. Rhetoric like this is bidirectional—

searches also surfaced clips of conservatives calling Democrats fascists (e.g., Trump in 2020).

 If you want more specifics, deeper analysis of a clip, or searches on a narrower timeframe/platform, let me know! 

 

Anti-Charlie Kirk firings

Confirmed firings

• Matthew Dowd — political analyst, formerly a contributor on MSNBC — “no longer with the network” after on-air comments about Kirk’s rhetoric and the shooting. ([AP News][1])
• Laura Sosh-Lightsy — Assistant/Associate Dean of Student Care & Conduct, Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU) — fired after social-media posts that university called “insensitive.” ([Inside Higher Ed][2])
• Dr. Michael Rex — English/creative-writing professor, Cumberland University — no longer employed after “inappropriate” internet comments. ([https://www.wsmv.com][3])
• Max (or Maxx) Wood(s) — assistant esports coach / staff member, Cumberland University — no longer employed after related online comments. ([https://www.wsmv.com][3])
• Charlie Rock — communications/PR staffer, Carolina Panthers — terminated after social-media content about Kirk’s death. ([PR Week][4])
• Junior sustainability strategist (name not publicly disclosed) — Nasdaq — terminated for social-media posts that Nasdaq said condoned/celebrated violence. ([Reuters][5])
• Bobby Machado — radio producer, Fox Sports Las Vegas / Lotus Communications (Las Vegas sports radio) — fired after profanity-laced posts appearing to celebrate Kirk’s death. ([https://www.fox5vegas.com][6])
• Ole Miss employee (reported name in local coverage) — staff member, University of Mississippi — fired for “hurtful, insensitive comments” about Kirk’s death. ([Mississippi Today][7])
• Derek Woods — (reported) football coach/employee, Klein Independent School District (TX) — fired after social-media remarks about the killing. ([Houston Chronicle][8])

Notes / broader context

• Reporting shows the list is still growing: teachers, university staff, firefighters, military personnel, sports-team employees, journalists and others have been fired, suspended, put on leave, or are under investigation for posts tied to the killing. (roundups: The Guardian, Education Week, Washington Post). ([The Guardian][9])
• Some outlets report firings or disciplinary actions at other private firms, law firms, airlines and local governments (e.g., Perkins Coie, Delta suspensions reported in live coverage), but not every piece names the individual publicly — in some cases reporting cites employer actions without giving the employee’s name. ([The Wall Street Journal][10])

 

Actual Racism is Human Natures appreciation of their own species...Now totally Distorted ..

 

https://tonysawesomememes.blogspot.com/2017/07/tonys-memeskey-word-lies-truth-etc.html

Key word Trump
https://tonysawesomememes.blogspot.com/2017/07/exconservative-great-memes-key-word.html

Key word Media
https://tonysawesomememes.blogspot.com/2017/07/exconservative-great-memes-key-word_4.html

Key Word - Muslim, Islam
https://tonysawesomememes.blogspot.com/2017/07/exconservative-great-memes-key-word_7.html

Key word, CNNhttps://tonysawesomememes.blogspot.com/2018/01/exconservatives-awesome-memes-key.html
https://tonysawesomememes.blogspot.com/2017/08/key-word-racism-race-black-colorex.html

Key word HOMOSEXUAL
https://tonysawesomememes.blogspot.com/2017/07/godmademan-devolved-to-liberal-then.html

https://tonysawesomememes.blogspot.com/2017/07/exconservative-awesome-memes-key-word.html
Key word - Black, Race, black privilege, etc

https://tonysawesomememes.blogspot.com/2017/07/exconservatives-awesome-memeskey-word.html

Key word, OBAMA
https://tonysawesomememes.blogspot.com/2017/07/ex-conservatives-awesome-memes-key-word.html

Key word - Clinton
https://tonysawesomememes.blogspot.com/2017/07/exconservatives-awesome-memes-key.html

Key word - Communism
https://tonysawesomememes.blogspot.com/2018/04/exconservative-awesome-memeskey-word_21.html

Grok responds to What are the ramifications of Trump ignoring ACTIVIST courts deFacto illegal rulings....What IF

 

If President Trump were to ignore federal court rulings, it would spark a constitutional crisis, challenging the separation of powers enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. Federal judges, even those perceived as "leftist," derive their authority from Article III, and their rulings are binding unless overturned by a higher court or Congress acts to change the law. Ignoring judicial orders would undermine the rule of law, a cornerstone of American governance, and could set a precedent for executive overreach.

Historically, defying court orders is rare but not unprecedented. President Lincoln ignored a habeas corpus ruling during the Civil War, citing national security, and President Biden faced criticism for bypassing court rulings on student loan forgiveness. Recent posts on X suggest some Trump supporters advocate ignoring "unconstitutional" rulings by lower courts, arguing that only the Supreme Court holds ultimate authority over the executive branch. However, this view oversimplifies the judiciary’s role. Lower courts can issue binding injunctions, and while appeals can delay or overturn them, outright defiance risks legal and political fallout.[](https://x.com/profstonge/status/1889433113790705813)[](https://x.com/profstonge/status/1889433113790705813)[](https://x.com/WallStreetMav/status/1894810685818749019)

For example, recent judicial blocks on Trump’s policies—like tariffs ruled illegal by the U.S. Court of International Trade or National Guard deployments in California—demonstrate courts acting as checks on executive power. If Trump ignored these, courts could escalate by holding officials in contempt, though enforcement would rely on the executive branch itself, creating a practical deadlock. Some X posts claim the Department of Justice, under a Trump-appointed AG, could "decline to prosecute" such contempt charges, but this would further erode judicial authority.[](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/28/business/trump-tariffs-blocked-federal-court.html)[](https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2025/06/12/newsom-trump-court-ruling-military-la/)[](https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/06/06/boasberg-judges-contempt-bankruptcy-loans/)

The Supreme Court is set to rule soon on the scope of lower courts’ power to issue nationwide injunctions, which could clarify or limit judicial checks on Trump’s agenda. Until then, ignoring rulings could embolden critics, alienate moderates, and invite legal challenges that delay his policies further. It might also galvanize his base, as seen in X posts urging defiance of "activist judges

."[](https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/16/politics/trump-judicial-power-supreme-court)[](https://dailycaller.com/2025/06/16/gregg-jarrett-judges-lack-authority-block-trump/)[](https://x.com/JdizzoTheReal/status/1902152474170941777)

Practically, Trump could appeal rulings to higher courts, as his administration has done with Judge Breyer’s National Guard order, which was stayed by the Ninth Circuit. This approach delays implementation without directly defying the judiciary. Alternatively, he could push Congress to pass laws overriding specific judicial blocks, though this requires political capital and a cooperative legislature.[](https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2025/06/12/newsom-trump-court-ruling-military-la/)

Ignoring rulings might yield short-term wins but risks long-term damage to institutional trust and could invite reciprocal defiance from future administrations. The judiciary’s slow pace often outlasts political will, as seen in over 180 rulings pausing Trump’s initiatives. Defiance could also alienate conservative judges, like Trump appointee Vyskocil, who dismissed a case against his administration but criticized overreach by plaintiffs expecting a "friendly" judge.

[](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/29/us/politics/trump-judges-attacks-tariffs.html)[](https://thefederalist.com/2025/06/17/federal-judge-takes-swipe-at-judicial-coup-in-opinion-dismissing-teachers-union-suit-against-trump-admin/)

In short, ignoring judicial rulings would be a high-stakes gamble, potentially paralyzing governance and escalating tensions between branches. Appealing, legislating, or waiting for Supreme Court clarity are less destabilizing paths.

GROK lists all the attempts by Democrats to target or undermine Donald Trump

Here are some key actions associated with Democrats that have been cited by critics (e.g., in X posts or Republican narratives) as attempts to target Donald Trump, along with context to clarify their nature:

1. **Russia Collusion Investigation (2016–2019)**  
   - **Description**: The investigation into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election and potential ties to Trump’s campaign, led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, was initiated under the Obama administration’s DOJ and continued under Trump’s presidency. Democrats heavily supported the probe, which critics claim was a tactic to delegitimize Trump’s election.  
   - **Context**: The Mueller report found no conclusive evidence of a criminal conspiracy between Trump’s campaign and Russia but noted multiple contacts and instances of obstruction of justice concerns. Some Republicans, like @gayelephantdad on X, call it a "hoax" meant to smear Trump, though the investigation was rooted in intelligence reports of Russian hacking.  [](https://x.com/gayelephantdad/status/1932949528597995986)[](https://x.com/gayelephantdad/status/1932949743040082056)
   - **Outcome**: No charges against Trump for collusion, but the narrative fueled political division.

2. **Impeachments (2019 and 2021)**  
   - **Description**: Trump was impeached twice by the Democrat-controlled House. The first (2019) was over allegations of pressuring Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden, and the second (2021) was for inciting the January 6 Capitol riot.  
   - **Context**: Democrats argued these were necessary to uphold democratic norms, while critics, including @RNCResearch, labeled them as politically motivated attacks to remove Trump from office or tarnish his reputation. Both impeachments ended in Senate acquittals.  [](https://thefulcrum.us/big-picture/trump-threat-to-democracy)[](https://x.com/RNCResearch/status/1780356755647569972)
   - **Outcome**: No removal from office, but the impeachments kept legal and political pressure on Trump.

3. **New York Legal Actions (2020–2024)**  
   - **Description**: New York AG Letitia James and Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg pursued legal cases against Trump, including a civil fraud case against the Trump Organization and a criminal case over hush-money payments (resulting in 34 felony convictions in 2024).  
   - **Context**: Critics, like @mrddmia and @TwinTowerCity, claim these were politically driven "lawfare" efforts, pointing to James’ campaign promise to target Trump and novel legal theories used in prosecutions. Democrats argue they were enforcing accountability for financial misconduct and election-related violations.  [](https://x.com/mrddmia/status/1645804835961462785)[](https://x.com/TwinTowerCity/status/1933304158784008244)
   - **Outcome**: The fraud case led to a $454 million penalty (under appeal), and the hush-money conviction is pending appeal, with no jail time served as of June 2025.

4. **Efforts to Remove Trump from Ballots (2023–2024)**  
   - **Description**: Democrats in several states, like Colorado and Maine, attempted to disqualify Trump from 2024 ballots, citing the 14th Amendment’s insurrection clause related to January 6.  
   - **Context**: These efforts were framed by Democrats as protecting democracy from an alleged insurrectionist. Posts on X, like @davidcd0418, call them undemocratic attempts to suppress Trump’s candidacy. The Supreme Court ruled in 2024 that states cannot bar federal candidates under this clause.  [](https://x.com/davidcd0418/status/1740878849909403917)
   - **Outcome**: Trump remained on ballots nationwide.

5. **Classified Documents and January 6 Investigations (2022–2024)**  
   - **Description**: Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigations led to indictments over Trump’s handling of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago and his role in January 6. Democrats supported these as upholding the rule of law.  
   - **Context**: Republicans, per @JonZiering, viewed these as weaponized DOJ actions to derail Trump’s 2024 campaign, especially given the timing and unprecedented nature of prosecuting a former president. Some charges were dismissed or stalled by June 2025, partly due to judicial rulings on presidential immunity.  [](https://x.com/JonZiering/status/1933811769186881951)
   - **Outcome**: Legal battles ongoing, with no convictions as of now.

### Critical Notes:
- **Perspective**: Many of these actions were framed by Democrats as accountability for alleged crimes or democratic threats, supported by legal or congressional processes. However, Republican critics and X posts argue they were coordinated efforts to politically neutralize Trump, often citing selective prosecution or timing (e.g., during campaign seasons). The truth likely involves a mix of legal accountability and political strategy, but evidence of a grand "ruse" conspiracy is inconclusive.
- **Sources**: I’ve incorporated sentiments from X posts and web sources where relevant, but I’ve treated them as inconclusive per guidelines, relying on verified outcomes (e.g., court rulings, Mueller report).  [](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump)[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Donald_Trump)
- **Limitations**: Without access to internal Democratic communications, it’s impossible to confirm intent behind these actions as "ruses." Public records show legal and political efforts, but their characterization as deceptive depends on perspective.

If you want a deeper dive into any specific action, alternative interpretations, or additional context (e.g., specific legal documents or X sentiment analysis), let me know! I can also check for more recent developments if needed.

The Presumptive Philosopher: Critics, speaking Loud...Never seeing the Forest f...

The Presumptive Philosopher: Critics, speaking Loud...Never seeing the Forest f...:   Please NOTE...   With emphasis on critics ....often negative...I often wonder..if those SQUEAL the loudest ever took note to this fact.......

 

With emphasis on critics....often negative...I often wonder..if those SQUEAL the loudest ever took note to this fact.....

GOOD people....presumably even those who KNOW BETTER often refuse to participate in the ugly work of politics...

for that REASON..it's ugly...so...we DEFAULT TO..

UGLY people dominating where good people, smarter, wiser are too busy "becoming successful' rarely noting the downfall of law and order until THEIR business gets burned and looted to the ground

 

Grok.com suggests

Critics often lean negative because it’s easier to point out flaws than to create or risk something themselves. Negativity grabs attention, establishes authority, and requires less vulnerability than building or supporting something. Many lack the courage or commitment to act on their critiques, as risking failure or exposure demands more than just voicing complaints. It’s a low-stakes position: criticize without accountability. Meanwhile, those who risk and do are too busy navigating real challenges to indulge in endless fault-finding. This dynamic isn’t universal, but it’s common enough to notice. 

 

j