Monday, January 28, 2019

How the LEFT was DEFEATED, thank you starbuck's Schultz- NO NEED for a THIRD party




Starbuck's SCHULTZ....3rd Party RUN...will END the Democrat Part


I have been saying for a long time...a third party will come about AND/OR the remaking of one of "the" two parties.

1. The democrats from the Left will get so whacked out going out of bounds LEFT...that the realization the far left's numbers will come out....(10% max)....

2. The republicans will turn so centrist that ...the republican party will be absorbed by RINO's
    now ripe for a THIRD party...


The democrats stay intact, the republicans stay intact...and TRUMP takes his millions and forms a "Constitutional REPUBLIC" Party/...

Now for Schultz, of star bucks....HE will guarantee #1....happening...NO need for a third party now....thanks Schultzy.....













































Tuesday, January 8, 2019

President Trump, OUR one LAST HOPE...build the wall or BUST! (one party system)

America, the great "EXPERIMENT"...still? 
Obama THE true experiment...FAILED


IDEOLOGUES never GIVE UP....

They control the language, creating Conventional Wisdom
 

The Media and Hollywood become the weapons against We the People
America an experiment, still...really?

 Doesn't an experiment conclude at a point to say,...

hey, it's working! Done....

Documented, IS!

but NOoooo...
we're still EXPERIMENTING ....really? 

 I reject this GhettoCrat JIVE on its face.....


OBAMA was THE experiment...

IT failed, Obama failed....the EXPERIMENT failed...

We're being played by the communist LEFT. We the People not quite getting it, until only recently....


OBAMA never left....screw EXPERIMENTING....we're IMPOSING upon you, like it or not..


The DEEP STATE is deep, so dam deep


 The MEDIA/ Social media is SOCIALIST media....lets be real.
 


Just remember....don't forget...

Trump is our one LAST hope. 
We will not have another chance....

ONE party rule...is how the communist make their experiment REAL....
file under the age of imposition




The steps to an experiment is as follows.  Pay attention to discover if we have CONCLUDED the Experiment....



 Make a prediction. From step 2, we have made a hypothesis that is tentative and may or may not be true. How can we decide if our hypothesis is true?
Our hypothesis should be broad; it should apply uniformly through time and through space. Scientists cannot usually check every possible situation where a hypothesis might apply. Let’s consider the hypothesis: All plant cells have a nucleus. We cannot examine every living plant and every plant that has ever lived to see if this hypothesis is false. Instead, we generate a prediction using deductive reasoning (generating a specific expectation from a generalization). From our hypothesis, we can make the following prediction: If I examine cells from a blade of grass, each one will have a nucleus. 

Perform an experiment. We rely again on our sensory perception to collect information. We design an experiment based on our prediction.
Our experiment might be as follows: 1000 patients between the ages of 50 and 70 will be randomly assigned to one of two groups of 500. The experimental group will take Celebra four times a day and the control group will take a starch placebo four times a day. The patients will not know whether their tablets are Celebra or the placebo. Patients will take the drugs for two months. At the end of two months, medical exams will be administered to determine if flexibility of the arms and fingers has changed.

Analyze the results of the experiment. Our experiment produced the following results: 350 of the 500 people who took Celebra reported diminished arthritis as the end of the period. 65 of the 500 people who took the placebo reported improvement.

 Draw a conclusion. From our analysis of the experiment, we have two possible outcomes: the results agree with the prediction or they disagree with the prediction. In our case, we can reject our prediction of no effect of Celebra. Because the prediction is wrong, we must also reject the hypothesis it was based on. 
link to above info  https://www.colby.edu/biology/BI17x/expt_method.html  


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Past National Emergencies 
Past emergencies have focused on everything from swine flu to rough diamonds.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4bdc953275921b394d7781ee1851abf5c8a3ff62d5f77cdec66a191fbc5b28ce.jpg
Here's a list of the 28 active national emergencies:

1. Blocking Iranian Government Propaerty (Nov. 14, 1979)

2. Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (Nov. 14, 1994)

3. Prohibiting Transactions with Terrorists Who Threaten to Disrupt the Middle East Peace Process (Jan. 23, 1995)

4. Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to the Development of Iranian Petroleum Resources (Mar. 15, 1995)

5. Blocking Assets and Prohibiting Transactions with Significant Narcotics Traffickers (Oct. 21, 1995)

6. Regulations of the Anchorage and Movement of Vessels with Respect to Cuba (Mar. 1, 1996)

7. Blocking Sudanese Government Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Sudan (Nov. 3, 1997)

8. Blocking Property of Persons Who Threaten International Stabilization Efforts in the Western Balkans (Jun. 26, 2001)

9. Continuation of Export Control Regulations (Aug. 17, 2001)

10. Declaration of National Emergency by Reason of Certain Terrorist Attacks (Sept. 14, 2001)

11.
Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Persons who Commit,
Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism (Sept. 23, 2001)

12. Blocking Property of Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Zimbabwe (Mar. 6, 2003)

13. Protecting the Development Fund for Iraq and Certain Other Property in Which Iraq has an Interest (May 22, 2003)

14. Blocking Property of Certain Persons and Prohibiting the Export of Certain Goods to Syria (May 11, 2004)

15. Blocking Property of Certain Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Belarus (Jun. 16, 2006)

16. Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (Oct. 27, 2006)

17.
Blocking Property of Persons Undermining the Sovereignty of Lebanon or
Its Democratic Processes and Institutions (Aug. 1, 2007)

18. Continuing Certain Restrictions with Respect to North Korea and North Korean Nationals (Jun. 26, 2008)

19. Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Somalia (Apr. 12, 2010)

20. Blocking Property and Prohibiting Certain Transactions Related to Libya (Feb. 25, 2011)

21. Blocking Property of Transnational Criminal Organizations (Jul. 25, 2011)

22. Blocking Property of Persons Threatening the Peace, Security, or Stability of Yemen (May 16, 2012)

23. Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine (Mar. 6, 2014)

24. Blocking Property of Certain Persons With Respect to South Sudan (Apr. 3, 2014)

25. Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Central African Republic (May 12, 2014)

26. Blocking Property and Suspending Entry of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Venezuela (Mar. 9, 2015)

27. Blocking the Property of Certain Persons Engaging in Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities (Apr. 1, 2015)

28. Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Burundi (Nov. 23, 2015)

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/780382d749a1b48bcd1346975bfb16830a67076ca3ac64b219a0480b34c8eab1.jpg