Monday, March 21, 2016

Muslim immigrants can currently get a visa waiver even if they do not have a passport.

READ THE FIRST PARAGRAPH BELOW ABOUT THE VISA WAIVER THEY HAVE BEEN GRANTING TO "KNOWN TERRORISTS" (UNBELIEVABLE) AND CALL YOUR SENATORS TO SUPPORT THIS VISA WAIVER PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT ACT (S.2362 AND YOUR REPRESENTATIVE TO FIND OUT WHAT THE EQUIVALENT ACT IS CALLED IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES!

HERE IS A "FREE" NUMBER TO CALL YOUR U.S. SENATORS & U.S. REP.:  1(866)220-0044


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Look at This Pony Express Technology for Visa Vetting
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:32:08 -0500
From: Pray For US <newsletter@prayfor.us>
Reply-To: webmaster@prayfor.us
To: LAURA LEIGHTON <laura427@cox.net>


Pray For US Email banner
                  image
03/20/2016
Dear LAURA,
We are supporting the Visa Waiver Program Improvement Act (S. 2362) to put a stop to Barack Obama's practice of granting immigrant visa waivers to known terrorists.
The Inspector General for the Department of Homeland Security told a Senate Committee that jihadis are being granted waivers due to the fact that all of the immigration "paperwork" kept by the federal government is... literally... "on paper."
The system has not been computerized to this day!
Today's Success Image
We know that this is deliberate on Obama's part because the immigration systems have not been upgraded the whole time that Obama has been in office.
The San Bernardino mail-order jihadi bride who helped kill 14 Americans entered the country on a visa waiver.
We are certain that others are gaining entry the same way and until we take the visa waiver program out of Obama's hands and give it back to Congress, this will continue!
Send FaxGrams to the Senate Judiciary Committee immediately and tell them to support and pass the Visa Waiver Program Improvement Act!
The bill was sponsored by Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and it will require DHS to finally upgrade its systems.
Image of Charles Benninghoff, Founder
Charles Benninghoff, Founder
We have posted a link to a copy of S. 2362 on this page so you can read it for yourself.
We like the bill because it closes many of the loopholes that Obama is exploiting to flood the United States with unvetted security threats from the Middle East.
Currently if a Muslim immigrant applies for a visa and they don't have the proper documentation, a US immigration worker has to pore through a warehouse of paperwork to try to find any records on them.
No wonder the FBI says it can't conduct background checks on Muslim immigrants!
It is much easier to simply grant the Muslim a visa waiver and let them in... and that is exactly what is happening!
The Waiver Program Improvement Act requires incoming immigrants to have an up-to-date, non-expired passport.
Muslim immigrants can currently get a visa waiver even if they do not have a passport.
Senate bill 2362 also BANS visa entry to any alien who has traveled to Iraq or Syria since 2011. Obama is handing visas out to those people left and right under the current system.
Send FaxGrams to as many Representatives and Senators as you can today and tell them to support and pass the Visa Waiver Program Improvement Act!
Exodus 12:49 says, "One law shall be for the native-born and for the stranger who dwells among you."
No nation can function with two sets of laws as America currently does under Obama. We have one set of laws for Americans and a different, privileged set of laws and regulations for foreigners and in particular Muslim foreigners!
Imagine if you tried to fly from one state to another in America and did not have any of the proper travel documents on you. The feds would lock you up!
Yet Obama's favored Muslims get a waiver to come right in!
Send your FaxGrams to stop this insanity today!
Send Faxes Now Image
Please send this link to others who share your concerns about the future of our nation:

After sending your FaxGrams, contact your Senators and Representative at 202-224-3121. Tell them to support and pass the Visa Waiver Program Improvement Act (Senate bill 2362).
Finally, please remember to "Like" our Facebook page and ask your online friends to "Like" us as well.
In His Name,
Charles Benninghoff Signature Image for Email
Charles Benninghoff, Founder
Pray For US
3773 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Ste 500 S.
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Personal Cell: 949-510-1100
Saints' Corner
Matt 5:15 Men should not
light a candle and put
it under a bowl, but
on a table, giving
light to all

It is more important that you pass
this message on to your
family, friends &
acquaintances
than give.

Please forward this powerful call to action
to all of your family members, friends and acquaintances.


The African-American Mosaic
Personal Stories and ACS New Directions

Refugees on levee, April 17, 1897, photo by Carroll's Art Gallery
Return to Colonization Liberia | Personal Stories and ACS New Directions

Robert E. Lee's Former Slaves Go to Liberia

Before the Civil War, Robert E. Lee freed most of his slaves and offered to pay expenses for those who wanted to go to Liberia. In November 1853, Lee's former slaves William and Rosabella Burke and their four children sailed on the Banshee, which left Baltimore with 261 emigrants. A person of superior intelligence and drive, Burke studied Latin and Greek at a newly established seminary in Monrovia and became a Presbyterian minister in 1857. He helped educate his own children and other members of his community and took several native children into his home. The Burkes's letters describing their lives in Liberia show that they relied on the Lees to convey messages to and from relatives still in Virginia, and the letters also reflect affection for their former masters.
“Table of Emigrants,” in The African Repository and Colonial Journal, vol. 30, no. 1, January 1854, p. 121 Journal General Collections, Library of Congress (17)
Bookmark this item: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/african/afam004.html#obj0

Letter from Liberian Colonist William Burke

Despite the hardships of being a colonist, William Burke was enthusiastic about his new life. After five years in Liberia he wrote that "Persons coming to Africa should expect to go through many hardships, such as are common to the first settlement in any new country. I expected it, and was not disappointed or discouraged at any thing I met with; and so far from being dissatisfied with the country, I bless the Lord that ever my lot was cast in this part of the earth. The Lord has blessed me abundantly since my residence in Africa, for which I feel that I can never be sufficiently thankful."
[Letter from William Burke to ACS president Ralph R. Gurley], July 26, 1858 American Colonization Society Papers Manuscript Division, Library of Congress (18)
Bookmark this item: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/african/afam004.html#obj1

Letter from Liberian Colonist Rosabella Burke

Letters from the Burkes to Mary Custis Lee, wife of Robert E. Lee, were published in the 1859 edition of The African Repository with Mrs. Lee's permission. This letter from Mrs. Burke to Mrs. Lee demonstrates personal warmth between the two women. Mrs. Burke shows concern for Mrs. Lee's health, tells Mrs. Lee about her children, and asks about the Lee children. The "little Martha" referred to was Martha Custis Lee Burke, born in Liberia and named for one of the Lee family. Repeating her husband's enthusiasm for their new life, Rosabella Burke says, "I love Africa and would not exhange it for America."
[Letter from Rosabella Burke to Mary Custis Lee], February 20, 1859, in The African Repository and Colonial Journal, vol. 35, no 7, July 1859, p. 216 General Collections, Library of Congress (20)
Bookmark this item: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/african/afam004.html#obj2

Information on Emigrants to Liberia

The ACS required potential emigrants to complete a form as part of their application for settlement in Liberia. This example lists twelve slaves whose master, Timothy Rogers of Bedford County, Virginia, freed them in his will under the condition that they go to Liberia. A note reveals that one of the group preferred to remain a slave if he were unable to free his wife, the property of another owner, to go with him. Forms like this provide a wealth of demographic and genealogical information about emigrants to Liberia.
“Applicants for Passage to Liberia,” ca. 1852 American Colonization Society Papers Manuscript Division, Library of Congress (21)
Bookmark this item: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/african/afam004.html#obj3

St. Paul's River Landscape

Because the soil around Monrovia was poor and the coastal areas were covered in dense jungle, many early emigrants to Liberia moved up the nearby St. Paul's River, where they found land suitable for farming. There they established small communities of people from the same geographic region in America. This photograph gives an idea of the appearance of the countryside in which the settlers began their new lives.
St. Paul's River, Liberia, ca. 1900 Photomural from silver-gelatin print. Prints and Photographs Division, Library of Congress (23)
Bookmark this item: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/african/afam004.html#obj4

Information on Emigrants Settled in Liberia

In 1867, the American Colonization Society published this list showing the names of ships, dates of sailing, and number of emigrants by state through December 1866. By that time, more than 13,000 blacks had been settled in Liberia through ACS efforts. The peak years were between 1848 and 1854, when the society chartered forty-one ships and transported nearly 4,000 colonists. After falling to the twenties in 1863 and 1864, the numbers went up again after the Civil War, when 527 people went in 1865 and 621 in 1866. The table shows that the 3,733 Virginia emigrants were the largest group, followed by North Carolina with 1,371, and Georgia with 1,341.
“Table of Emigrants Settled in Liberia by the American Colonization Society,” in The African Repository and Colonial Journal, vol. 43, no. 4, April 1867, p. 117 General Collections, Library of Congress (24)
Bookmark this item: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/african/afam004.html#obj5

Exodus from Arkansas

In the spring of 1880, a group of 150 African-Americans from Arkansas was living in temporary quarters at Mt. Olivet Baptist Chapel on 37th Street in New York before going to Liberia. Because the ACS had chartered the only ship that regularly went to Liberia, this group, which was going under its own auspices, was trying to charter another ship. The article that described their circumstances, entitled "Colored Exodus from Arkansas," stated that another 50,000 blacks were preparing to emigrate from the Gulf states to Arizona and New Mexico, where they planned to purchase farm land.
“Refugees awaiting transportation to Liberia at Mr. Olivet Baptist Chapel, New York City” From, Frank Leslie's Illustrated News, April 24, 1880, p. 120 Photomural from woodcut Prints and Photographs Division, Library of Congress (25)
Bookmark this item: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/african/afam004.html#obj6

New Directions for the ACS

In 1892, the ACS abandoned publication of The African Repository and replaced it with Liberia. The name change reflected a new direction for the society, as announced in the first issue of Liberia. Instead of aiding emigrants, the ACS turned its attention to the question of "How can the society best help and strengthen Liberia?" The society committed itself to fostering a public-school system in Liberia, promoting more frequent ships between the U.S. and Liberia, collecting and diffusing more reliable information about Liberia, and enabling Liberia to depend more on herself. Future colonists were to be selected with a view to the needs of Liberia, not their own situations. An example of this preferred type of colonist was Miss Georgia Patton, described in an early issue of Liberia. Well-educated, Miss Patton planned to practice medicine and teach school in Liberia. She also shared ... More
“Brief Autobiography of a Colored Woman Who Has Recently Emigrated to Liberia,” in Liberia, no. 3, November 1893, pp. 78-79 General Collections, Library of Congress (26)
“Dey's Mission, Liberia,” ca. 1900 Photomural from silver-gelatin print Prints and Photographs Division, Library of Congress (27)
Bookmark this item: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/african/afam004.html#obj7

Did Bonds Ever Reach Liberia?

In the summer of 1919, Henry Bonds, still in the U.S. and having moved to Tullahassee, Oklahoma, wrote the society once again about going to Liberia. He pointed out that World War I had stopped him, but that he still wanted to go and wanted to know if the aid promised him was still good. A number of letters between Bonds and the ACS exist, but they do not answer the question whether or not Bonds ever reached Liberia. Perhaps further research could provide the answer and more information about Bonds and his family.
[Letter from Henry Bonds of Tullahassee, Oklahoma], August 25, 1919 Holograph American Colonization Society Papers Manuscript Division, Library of Congress (28)
Bookmark this item: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/african/afam004.html#obj8

Application for ACS Help in Going to Liberia

In 1912, Henry Young Bonds of Vian, Oklahoma, began correspondence with the ACS about going to Liberia. As part of his application, Bonds sent in this formal, notarized form. Bonds expected to defray half of the $591 he needed as passage money for himself and his family and asked the ACS for the other part. He planned to sell his land to raise money for support while getting established in Liberia. After a two-year application process, Bond's request was approved by the ACS. He planned to sail in October 1914, but was prevented from doing so by the outbreak of World War I.
[Formal application of Henry Bonds to emigrate to Liberia], 1913 Legal document American Colonization Society Papers Manuscript Division, Library of Congress (29)
Bookmark this item: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/african/afam004.html#obj9

Henry Bonds Hopes to Emigrate

As part of his application for ACS aid in emigrating to Liberia, Henry Bonds submitted a postcard with a photograph of his family. Left to right are Catherine, eight; Bonds; Loretta, three; Bonds's wife Mary; and Floyd, six. Not pictured are two unnamed older, married children, perhaps from an earlier marriage, who did not wish to emigrate. Born in 1864 near Guntown, Mississippi, Bonds had come to Indian Territory (now Oklahoma) in April 1890. His wife Mary, thirty, born in Indian Territory near Tahlequah, was educated in the Cherokee colored high school and had taught in the Vian colored school.
[Henry Y. Bonds and family], ca. 1912 Photomural from silver-gelatin print American Colonization Society Papers Manuscript Division, Library of Congress (30)
Bookmark this item: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/african/afam004.html#obj10

Recommendation for Liberia Applicant

Because the American Colonization Society was very concerned about the character of emigrants they sent to Liberia, applicants had to submit letters of recommendation. This highly favorable letter came from officials of the Citizens Bank of Vian. Bonds also supplied one from J.H. Dodd, M.D., who said that Bonds had "a host of friends in all the races" and that his family was "regarded as one of the very best in the country."
[Letter of recommendation for Henry Bonds], 1913 American Colonization Society Papers Manuscript Division, Library of Congress (31)
Bookmark this item: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/african/afam004.html#obj11

Map showing Vian, Oklahoma, and Surrounding Territory

Beginning in the early 1800s, Cherokees, Choctaws, and other eastern Native American tribes signed treaties giving up southeastern land in return for land west of the Mississippi in what became known as Indian Territory, or even later, Oklahoma. In addition, some tribes were removed to the areas by force. After the Civil War, the United States government confiscated territory from Native Americans who had supported the Confederacy and, in 1889, opened that land to other settlers. This map of the Vian area shows land owned by Henry Bonds's children. A plot in the left corner of section 34 and one in the lower middle are assigned to his daughter Catherine Bonds, "N.B.F.," which stands for "new-born freedman," a term apparently applied to blacks born after Emancipation, as well as former slaves. The plot labeled N.B.F. 457, is also probably part of a Bonds claim. It is unclear why t ... More
[Map of Vian area] Indian Territory: Cherokee Nation Muskogee, Indian Territory [Oklahoma]: Indian Territory Map Company, 1909 Photomural Geography and Map Division, Library of Congress (32)
Bookmark this item: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/african/afam004.html#obj12

ACS Supports Liberian Education

The Booker T. Washington Institute at Kakata, Liberia, was founded in 1929 by a group of American missionary and philanthropic organizations, including the American Colonization Society. Like Tuskegee Institute, the school emphasized vocational training and prepared many young Liberians for jobs in agriculture, auto mechanics, carpentry, masonry, and other trades. The campus of the institute was built on a 1,000-acre tract of land granted by the Liberian government. As the accompanying letter shows, the ACS provided funding for the institution.
1 of 2
  • Campus of Booker T. Washington Institute in Liberia, ca. 1940 Photomural from silver-gelatin print Prints and Photographs Division, Library of Congress (33)
  • [Letter about ACS support for Booker T. Washington Institute], June 10, 1940 Typed letter American Colonization Society Papers Manuscript Division, Library of Congress (34)
Bookmark this item: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/african/afam004.html#obj13



















Tuesday, March 15, 2016

Every Delegate At GOP Convention Not Bound On First Ballot Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/03/13/rnc-rules-comm-member-every-delegate-at-gop-convention-not-bound-on-first-ballot

 As Discussed on Limbaughs Radio program today....from the Daily Caller....sourcing a RNC rules committee member, Curly Haugland...Let sent to RNC...below
 http://sgtreport.com/2016/03/rush-limbaugh-watch-out-for-jeb-at-the-convention/
Letter from the RNC, Rules committee
 Republican
National
Committee
Curly Haugland
National Committeeman for North Dakota
Box 1473
Bismarck, ND
58502
March 11, 2016
Fellow Republican National Committee Members,
NEWS FLASH: All Republican Delegates to the 2016 Republican National
Convention are Unbound!
As most of you know, I have been defending the right of the delegates to the
Republican National Convention to vote according to their personal choice in all
matters to come before the Republican National Convention, including the vote
to nominate the Republican Candidate for President, for several years.
Here is something I recently discovered that most of us did not know, including
me!
Binding delegates to the results of presidential preference primaries first
appeared in the Rules of the Republican Party in 1976.
I write about this in the next chapter of my “Owner’s Manual for Delegates”
entitled “Spinning Straw Into Gold”.
“Select, allocate and bind. The fraudulent addition of these three words to the
Rules of the Republican Party in the 2008 Convention, as detailed in Chapter
One, is the political equivalent of "spinning straw into gold".
Without the use of force to bind the votes of delegates to the results of the
primary process, primaries are nearly worthless "beauty contests".
This chapter explores the history of "binding" in the Republican presidential
nomination process, and reveals some stunning facts.
Delegates have been bound only once in the history of the Republican Party.
In 1976, the Ford campaign, afraid of losing "pledged" delegates to Reagan
forces and having the strength of delegate numbers needed, forced the
adoption of the "Justice Resolution" which amended the convention rules to
bind the delegates to cast their convention votes according to the results of
binding primaries.
This historic event was the first convention in the history of the Republican
Party where the delegates were denied the freedom to vote as they wished in the
nomination vote for President. And, 1976 was also the last time delegates have
been bound by convention rules to cast their votes according to the results of
binding primary elections, since the 1980 convention rescinded the Justice
Resolution entirely restoring the prohibition of binding.
This history has huge implications for 2016, since it calls attention to the fact
that the convention rules of the Republican Party do not bind delegates to cast
their votes according to the results of binding primaries.
Therefore, as "spinning straw into gold" is to primaries, "Rumplestiltskin" is
toconventions. Delegates to the 2016 convention are not bound.”
Before you rush to ask “what does the Counsel”s Office say about this” I offer
this statement from that office:
. “One of the important rules changes over the last 50 years has been the
unit rule prohibited…that change was made so that an individual delegate can
vote his or her conscience.” (transcript, RNC Standing Committee on the Rules,
January 19, 2006 pp 93-94)
That statement was made by Tom Josefiak to the members of the RNC Rules
Committee as part of an orientation session for Rules Committee members. Mr.
Josefiak was part of a panel of expert presenters that also included Ben Ginsberg,
Mike Duncan, and Morton Blackwell. The meeting was presided over by David
Norcross, chairman of the RNC Rules Committee.
And, the rule Mr. Josefiak referred to is current Rule 38, Unit Rule.
That’s right. Every delegate to the 2016 Republican National Convention is a
completely free agent, free to vote for the candidate of their choice on every
ballot at the convention in Cleveland in July. Every delegate is a Superdelegate!
In Chapter One, I discussed the fraudulent process that was employed to insert
the words “select, allocate and bind” into the section of the Rules of the
Republican Party that deal with the election of delegates to the national
convention.
The rest of the chapter, Spinning Straw Into Gold, will provide much more detail
to expose the actors and the methods that have been employed over the past
several presidential nominations to Spin Straw Into Gold by stealing the right to
choose the party’s presidential nominee and transferring that right to the Political
Industrial Complex who have turned primaries into gold.
We are the Republican National Committee, this has been done on our watch and
there is nothing we can do about it until the 2016 convention.
What happens then is an open question that can only be answered by the
delegates that will constitute the highest authority of the Republican Party of the
United States, the Republican National Convention of 2016.
Curly Haugland
Republican National Committeeman for North Dakota

Joseph McCarthy responds to Murrow - full See It Now episode

#edMorrow #joemcCarthyERA  LIES exposed  #venonapapers
http://comunistmanifesto101.blogspot.com/2016/03/era-of-trump-meets-mccarthy-errorthe.html

Glenn Beck-McCarthy and the Venona papers

 Becks "pet Rabbi"...stuns BECK with brutal honesty.see "lesser of two evils clip"
http://www.glennbeck.com/2016/05/20/glenns-mind-officially-blown-rabbi-daniel-lapin-boards-the-trump-train/

One of Glenn’s favorite people joined The Glenn Beck Program on Friday. Rabbi Daniel Lapin, whose weekly radio podcast on TheBlaze.com has 6.5 million monthly downloads, stopped by to discuss the migrant crisis, America’s special place in the world and the mind-blowing fact that he’s boarded the Trump train. On Voting for Trump or Hillary “Does there ever come a point when the evil is too much? The evil on both sides? It’s like, I can’t do it,” Glenn asked. “I don’t think so,” Rabbi Lain replied. “And I say this with considerable more than respect, a deep admiration for the peril in which you placed your entire career and your enterprise in the incredibly courageous stand you took in politics over the last few months. I truly believe that the history books in the future will speak of this election and identify you as perhaps the only business professional, the only media businessperson who has ever put his integrity on the line like that, and stuck to princip

Source: http://www.glennbeck.com/2016/05/20/glenns-mind-officially-blown-rabbi-daniel-lapin-boards-the-trump-train/?utm_source=glennbeck&utm_medium=contentcopy_link


zzz
#edMorrow #joemcCarthyERA  LIES exposed  #venonapapers
http://comunistmanifesto101.blogspot.com/2016/03/era-of-trump-meets-mccarthy-errorthe.html

Monday, March 14, 2016

LIVE Stream: Donald Trump Rally in Hickory, NC at Lenoir-Rhyne Universit...

Obama to executive order himself to the Supreme Court - Wait he can't do that...!


Obama will executive ORDER himself to the post of Supreme Court Justice....!  I know, I know...he can't do that.....like that got in his way in the past...ok...he can't I got it..

But guess what...


Hillary CAN.....and WILL.....why ARE they both being so nice to each other.

 

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2016/0127/Could-Barack-Obama-become-a-Supreme-Court-justice


Could Barack Obama become a Supreme Court justice?





Hillary Clinton said that President Obama would make a great Supreme Court justice. Is that possible?


Can a former POTUS go to work on the SCOTUS? Hillary Clinton thinks so.
At an event in Iowa, an audience member asked Mrs. Clinton, a Democratic presidential candidate, whether she would nominate President Obama for a role on the Supreme Court if she became the next president. Mrs. Clinton responded immediately, according to CBS News:
Wow, what a great idea. Nobody has ever suggested that to me. Wow, I love that, wow. He may have a few other things to do, but I tell you that's a great idea … He's brilliant and he can set forth an argument and he was a law professor. He's got all the credentials. 
Currently, Supreme Court justices have an average age of around 75, according to birthdates available from the Supreme Court website. Four of the justices will be over 80 by the end of the next presidential term, leading many to assume that the next president, Republican or Democrat, will likely appoint at least one Supreme Court justice.
But could President Barack Obama become Justice Barack Obama?
Legally, yes. Politically, maybe not.
“There are no constitutional restrictions on who can become a Supreme Court Justice (or any federal judge, for that matter),” Suzanna Sherry, professor of law at Vanderbilt Law School, told The Christian Science Monitor.
Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution states that the President has the power to appoint Supreme Court justices, among other offices, with the approval and consent of the Senate. Requirements as to who can be nominated were not included, leaving it to the discretion of the president.
There is also precedent for former presidents serving on the Supreme Court. William Howard Taft, the 27th President of the United States from 1909 to 1913, later served on the Supreme Court as Chief Justice from 1921 to 1930, according to his White House biography.
President Obama’s biggest hurdle to a Supreme Court appointment would likely be a political one.
“Any Supreme Court appointment must be made with the advice and consent of the Senate – which is currently controlled by Republicans, and is likely to be vulnerable to a Republican filibuster for the foreseeable future,” Seth Kreimer, Kenneth W. Gemmill Professor of Law at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, told The Christian Science Monitor via email.
The Senate must confirm any Supreme Court appointments made by the president. Constitutionally, the only requirement is a vote from the Senate approving the appointment. However, the candidate also has to go through a Judiciary Committee hearing before reaching a general Senate vote.
Although rejection of a nominee for the Supreme Court is rare, it has happened in the past. The last rejected nominee was Robert Bork, who was nominated by Ronald Reagan and rejected by the Senate in 1987.
Mrs. Clinton referenced the need for a Democrat-controlled Senate in her answer in Iowa.
"Now, we do have to get a Democratic Senate to get him confirmed, so you're going to have to help me on that."
But Obama himself may not favor the idea. In an interview with the New Yorker in 2014, President Obama was asked about the possibility of a Taft-like move from the presidency to the Supreme Court. Ultimately, Obama rejected the idea.
“When I got out of law school, I chose not to clerk,” he told the New Yorker. “Partly because I was an older student, but partly because I don’t think I have the temperament to sit in a chamber and write opinions.”