Saturday, November 28, 2015

.Islam, by law, is prohibited from US immigration - 1952 McCarran Walters ACT

  The False Narrative DeFacto rejection...

It is the law: (see "revision 1965) info at the bottom of Blog.

ISLAM IS NOT ALLOWED IN USA!


OBAMA FORGOT ABOUT THIS LAW..

.Islam, by law, is prohibited from US immigration
The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States. 


That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today. Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by "force, violence, or other unconstitutional means." 

This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic immigration to the United States, but this law is being ignored by the White House.Islamic immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic. 

All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life's guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government. 
Now the political correct crowd would say that Islamists cannot be prohibited from entering the US because Islam is a religion. 
Whether it is a religion is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any "organization" that advocates the overthrow of our government are prohibited.
Written by
Sherrie Lynn Aldrich
To be or NOT to BEcome an American.....NOT the Way we ROLL....sorry charlie...


from the link
http://library.uwb.edu/static/USimmigration/1952_immigration_and_nationality_act.html

1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, a.k.a. the McCarran-Walter Act (An act to revise the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality; and for other purposes)
H.R. 13342; Pub.L. 414; 182 Stat. 66.
82nd Congress; June 27, 1952.
You can find the full text of this law here or download the PDF.

SUMMARY
Otherwise known as the McCarran-Walter Act, the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 was meant to exclude certain immigrants from immigrating to America, post World War II and in the early Cold War. The McCarran-Walter Act moved away from excluding immigrants based simply upon country of origin. Instead it focused upon denying immigrants who were unlawful, immoral, diseased in any way, politically radical etc. and accepting those who were willing and able to assimilate into the US economic, social, and political structures, which restructured how immigration law was handled. Furthermore, the most notable exclusions were anyone even remotely associated with communism which in the early days of the Cold War was seen as a serious threat to US democracy. The main objective of this was to block any spread of communism from outside post WWII countries, as well as deny any enemies of the US during WWII such as Japan and favor “good Asian” countries such as China. The McCarran-Walter Act was a strong reinforcement in immigration selection, which was labeled the best way to preserve national security and national interests. President Truman originally vetoed the law, deeming it discriminatory; however there was enough support in Congress for the law to pass.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

REVISED?

The 1965 act marked a radical break from the immigration policies of the past. The law as it stood then excluded Asians and Africans and preferred northern and western Europeans over southern and eastern ones.[2] At the height of the civil rights movement of the 1960s the law was seen as an embarrassment by, among others, President John F. Kennedy, who called the then-quota-system "nearly intolerable".[3] After Kennedy's assassination, President Lyndon Johnson signed the bill at the foot of the Statue of Liberty as a symbolic foothold of signing the bill.

In order to convince the American people of the legislation's merits, its proponents assured that passage would not influence America's culture significantly. President Johnson called the bill "not a revolutionary bill. It does not affect the lives of millions",[4] while Secretary of State Dean Rusk and other politicians, including Senator Ted Kennedy, hastened to reassure the populace that the demographic mix would not be affected; these assertions would later prove grossly inaccurate.[5]

In line with earlier immigration law, the bill also prohibited the entry into the country of "sexual deviants", including homosexuals. By doing so it crystallized the policy of the INS that had previously been rejecting homosexual immigrants on the grounds that they were "mentally defective" or had a "constitutional psychopathic inferiority". The provision discriminating against gay people was rescinded by the Immigration Act of 1990.[6]
(Summary by Wade Johnson)
RELATED SITES
The McCarran-Walter Act: A Contradictory Legacy on Race, Quotas, and Ideology - A useful overview of the entire conflict of Immigration Nationality Act of 1952, providing information from the point of view of president Truman, Congressman Walter, Senator McCarran, and provides an informative evaluation of the legislation.
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (Walter-McCarran Act) - Describes the Act in detail historically, factually, socially, economically, politically and is useful in developing a substantive critique of the INA and its particular effects upon America and immigrants in general.
The Cold War at Home from GoogleBooks - First few sections of a book about the red scare in America which provides useful information about what started the red scare and how the McCarthy tactics were carried out.

43 comments:

  1. Another reason to impeach Obama; another reason we need Senators and Reps with backbones to impeach.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This was replaced in 1965.

      Delete
    2. http://www.snopes.com/islam-banned-u-s-1952/

      Delete
    3. You still get your "facts" from SNOPES? lol George Soros runs those people.

      Delete
    4. It's a fact that a subset of Muslim immigrants want to implement Sharia law in the United States. This alone justifies a ban on further immigration by Muslims. Numerous attacks by Islamic terrorists against America citizens constitute a clear and present danger to the security of the United States. It is difficult to ascertain which immigrants are a serious threat to our security, so the safest course of action is to ban all Muslims from entering the U.S. Immigration is a privilege, not a constitutional right.

      Delete
  2. Agreed.Our congress is right now,and have been,pretty much useless in doing their sworn duty.I applaud the foresight in the McCarran-Walter act.Now,it just needs to be used,and right now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As with much of our laws, unless it is backed up and enforced it is just paper.

      Delete
    2. The Power of the Pen means squat unless back up by the sword. Has been like this throughout all of history....

      Delete
  3. I've sent this article to my state Senators, Representative and Governor. It's their job along with Obama to keep America safe. Since Obama refuses to abide by our laws, we only have our state held officers to uphold the law.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Salute, Sea....that's what this is all about.....this post on FB is going ballistic....

      Delete
    2. Ballistic they may go...but this Act was changed in 1965 due to its xenophobic discriminatory nature and its intent. It was replaced by & Titled :
      An Act to Amend the nationality and immigration act acronyms (colloquial) INA nicknames Hart--Celler Act enacted by the 89th Congress effective June 30th,1968, Public Law Pub.L.89-236 Statutes at Large 79 Stat. 911

      Sorry to ruin the fantasy that Obama and congress aren't aware of laws.

      Delete
    3. Bummer - truths wills out agaian

      Delete
    4. What is discriminatory about it? It doesn't single out one group but any group or organization that poses a threat to our nation. I am so sick of the Dems using the "discriminatory" card. Can't discriminate, let them in and kill us because we can't discriminate! That is bull s! We'll discriminate all we want if it means saving the lives of innocent Americans and preserving our heritage and our culture. As they say, "In Rome do as the Romans do." Well, in America do as the Americans do or you're going to find yourself killed. It hasn't started yet, the random disappearance of Islamists but I can see it happening. Too many gun owners pissed off at the illogical way the government is approaching this problem. Don't they know the Islamists are taught to be good and peaceful on the surface, they call it "Muruna" and then they do evil once people let their guard down. This has been their practice of going between good and evil. They all need to be rounded up. Sorry, it's us or them and it's not going to be us!

      Delete
    5. Natural selection on display I fear.....salute...

      Delete
  4. One has to wonder, where in the hell are all the so called Const. Lawyers out of the some 500 of those bastards after the last 7 years ? The dems and repubs are one in the same and I said it before and I will continue to say it. They have let all of this happen either out of pure cowardice or criminal intent. Either way that means they are all incompetent to even be there. They know it and more and more of the people know it. Just wait until their ignorant low info moronic voters catch on and it is just a matter of time, then many if not all will get a good come upens. The sooner the better as far as I'm concerned. Bunch of yellowbellied traitors, criminals and thieves. :(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. agreed....post going ballistic on fb...

      Delete
  5. But, a house divided against itself will fall. Do we see? The push away from the constitution, our laws, our sovereign states pushing us toward global government and taxation? They keep us fighting with one another about stuff that does matter while they dismantle our country like a company bought to sell of its assets. Why not see the big picture instead of fighting over the details?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree Lisa....too many people having it too good to KNOW what bad is.....till a fish ends up on dry land does it understand exactly what WET is....salute

      Delete
  6. Thank you for showing this language in the McCarren Act.

    This sort of language had actually been law since 1903. It was, at first, aimed at Anarchists. It was a reaction to the assassination - by an anarchists - of McKinley. And, of course, our oath of naturalization says you may not be loyal to any foreign potentate. Here is my video on the subject. Thanks!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2r01jwoSrs

    ReplyDelete
  7. Unfortunately there is an 1980 refugee act. http://immigration.about.com/od/usimmigrationhistory/fl/What-Is-the-United-States-Refugee-Act-of-1980.htm

    ReplyDelete
  8. The is plenty of proof that the "religion" of is lslam is not a religion but rather it is a cult in support of political Islam which consists of all jihadis. Those are the fanatical Islamist who are always at war with the western civilization and have been ever since Muhammed claimed that the Angel Gabriel brought word from God he was God's appointed prophet. He took that to mean he was to form an army and start killing anyone not a member of Islam by birth or who rejects Islam regardless of their birth.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The is plenty of proof that the "religion" of is lslam is not a religion but rather it is a cult in support of political Islam which consists of all jihadis. Those are the fanatical Islamist who are always at war with the western civilization and have been ever since Muhammed claimed that the Angel Gabriel brought word from God he was God's appointed prophet. He took that to mean he was to form an army and start killing anyone not a member of Islam by birth or who rejects Islam regardless of their birth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed, thanks for the reply...Liberalism INCARNATE is Islam...and vice versa...no other explanation....

      Delete
  10. This is only one off the many laws that Obama chose to ignore. If he does not agree with them he does not enforce them. This is a direct violation of his oath of office. If Obama was,a white conservative the liberals would be hanging him in effigy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hanging in effigy....one can only hope....salute, John...

      Delete


  11. The THIRD shooter....disappeared from the Media's consciousness? or another #fastANDfurious affair?
    http://spectator.org/articles/64891/odd-man-out-what-happened-third-shooter

    http://www.theverge.com/2015/12/9/9878050/donald-trump-darth-vader-mashup

    ReplyDelete
  12. PLEASE REMOVE OBAMA AND HIS MUSLIM ADMINISTRATION NOW. HE IS A FRAUD, AND THIS LAW SHOULD BE ENFORCED TO GET HIM OUT. IF IT IS NOT, THEN THE AMERICAN LAWS HAVE FAILED US AND WE ARE DOOMED. GOD BLESS AMERICA AND THANK YOU MR. TRUMP FOR TRYING TO SAVE OUR NATION.

    ReplyDelete
  13. PLEASE REMOVE OBAMA AND HIS MUSLIM ADMINISTRATION NOW. HE IS A FRAUD, AND THIS LAW SHOULD BE ENFORCED TO GET HIM OUT. IF IT IS NOT, THEN THE AMERICAN LAWS HAVE FAILED US AND WE ARE DOOMED. GOD BLESS AMERICA AND THANK YOU MR. TRUMP FOR TRYING TO SAVE OUR NATION.

    ReplyDelete
  14. This President was ordained by Satan to bring this country down.I tried to warn as many as I could when he was running for office. I made a few enemies, though they have a changed mind at this time which is to late. America will fall under the administration

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. we are a nation that does not allow a state religion such as islam and shira law. they allow killing of nonbelievers and that is why it is #1 in the global village (it is a global economy).I worry about America (and our economy) and cults that portray as religion should rejected from coming here.

      Delete
  15. Obama is Islamic. He has admitted many times he is a Muslim and recently visited a radical terrorist promoting Islamic Mosque. He should never have been allowed to even run for president. There was so much deceit and fraud, and it just gets to be more and more.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. agreed.....Manchurian Candidate....actions vs words....double standard or simply Shuck & jive
      http://comunistmanifesto101.blogspot.com/2015/11/the-genesis-of-shuck-and-jivefrom-islam.html

      Delete
  16. Unfortunately, banning Muslims from entry into the US, is contrary to our moral codes. That is, of course, unless we define Islam as a political system intent on destroying the US, and that's not going to happen. There are too many Muslims here that are, currently, abiding by our laws and, currently, pose no imminent threat. The Bill to Designate the Muslim Brotherhood a Terrorist Organization in the US is a good first step in fighting the problem here, but would not, if passed, eliminate Muslims already here, or prevent additional Muslims from entering the US as refugees - thanks Obama - or Visas, and the like.
    Pew Research studies on the American Muslim (2007 & 2011) indicate 8% support suicide bombings to protect or advance Islamic agenda in America. With an estimated 2 million Muslims here, in 2011, that's 160,000 Muslims that support suicide attacks, in America, to protect or advance the Islamic agenda here.

    Argue the Law all you want, but Islam is the one common denominator in almost all terrorist attacks and civil chaos in the world today. Our humanitarian laws mandate we accept the wolf into our flock of Sheeples.
    Obama's military Rules of Engagement are killing our troops, and his civil Rules of Engagement are setting the people up to be killed as well.
    If Obama was the enemy, with ALL the word implies, what would he do differently?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed....

      Knowledge knowing all muslims are not terrorists.

      Wisdom
      Knowing it takes only a few...BUT we just don't know which ones....

      Delete
  17. He was a well trained by the Chicago political machine, and financed by (of all people) George SOROS who has brought down a number of governments. Google it.

    ReplyDelete
  18. He was a well trained by the Chicago political machine, and financed by (of all people) George SOROS who has brought down a number of governments. Google it.

    ReplyDelete